Galatians: The Holy Spirit

Happy Pentecost!

Icon of the Pentecost

Icon of the Pentecost (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Acts 2 records the fulfillment of a centuries-old prophecy: God sent His Holy Spirit in an unprecedented way. Some years later, the apostle Paul would write to the “bewitched” congregations in Galatia straightening them on their knowledge of the Spirit:

  • The person rescued by the Lord Jesus Christ receives the Spirit by believing the message of the gospel (3:2)
  • That person begins, continues and completes his/her spiritual life with the Spirit (3:3)
  • God gives His Spirit to the person who believes the gospel (3:5)
  • The Spirit is made available to Gentile believers through faith in Christ Jesus (3:14)
  • God sends the Spirit of his Son into the believer’s heart, the Spirit who calls out, “Abba, Father.” (4:6)
  • The son born by the Spirit is persecuted by the son born the natural way (4:29)
  • The people Christ died for eagerly await by faith through the Spirit the righteousness for which they hope (5:5)
  • Those who are called to be free live by the Spirit (5:16)
  • The Spirit desires what is contrary to the flesh (5:17)
  • Those who aren’t under the law are led by the Spirit (5:18)
  • The Spirit produces fruit in the lives of those who willl inherit the kingdom of God (5:22)
  • Those who belong to Christ Jesus live by and keep in step with the Spirit(5:25)
  • Those who sow to please the Spirit from the Spirit will reap eternal life (6:8)

Better—and prettier—king lists

One of the most viewed posts on this blog (currently at #6) is Kings and prophets in the Old Testament, in which I tried to make sense of all those monarchs. The lists I prepared for that post are fine if all you want is a bare-bones, sequential list of names.

If you’re looking for visual flair and essential information here are two I like:

Rulers of Israel and Judah, by the Good Book Company

Part of an infographic of the rulers of Israel and Judah

Click to view

Kings of Judah & Israel, by Visual Unit/ Mark Barry

Excerpt of an infographic of the Kings of Israel and Judah

Click to view

That said, if you’re interested in causes of death, my boring list is the only one with that info ;)


Foreigners in King David’s court

(Continuing my fixation with non-Israelites in the Old Testament.)

Not only did these people live among God’s covenant community, but they were also included in His scriptures!

Uriah the Hittite

While there were Hittites in Canaan during the patriarchal period (Genesis 23:10, 26:34), the Hittite homeland was in the area that is modern-day Turkey.

Uriah was a man of character to the point of defying the king’s orders. He would not allow himself any pleasures that his comrades on the battle field were denied (2 Samuel 11:11). In that verse he also mentions the ark of the covenant, so it is possible that he was faithful to the God of Israel.

Whatever the case, the Bible writers certainly look on him favourably, ranking him among David’s mighty men (2 Samuel 23:39; 1 Chronicles 11:41).

Ittai the Gittite

‘Gittite’ is the adjective deriving from Gath, which was the name of one of the main towns of the Philistines. (There may have been another town named Gath in Israel which would explain 2 Samuel 6:10-11.)

Ittai also defied the king. When David was fleeing from Jerusalem after Absalom’s coup, he urged Ittai to remain behind because he was a foreigner. Ittai’s response to David rivals Ruth’s response to Naomi some generations earlier: “As the LORD lives, and as my lord the king lives, wherever my lord the king shall be, whether for death or for life, there also will your servant be.” (2 Samuel 15:21 ESV)

Ittai makes a vow in the name of Yahweh, and we’re not given any reason to doubt his sincerity.

The Cushite messenger

‘Cush’ in the Bible refers to the area south of Egypt, very likely inhabited by dark-skinned Africans (like me!).

This particular messenger was sent by David’s army commander to give the king the news of the victory over Absalom and his army. The messenger probably knew that David wouldn’t take the news of his son’s death too well and was very tactful in his speech:

Then the Cushite arrived and said, “My lord the king, hear the good news! The LORD has delivered you today from all who rose up against you.”
The king asked the Cushite, “Is the young man Absalom safe?”
The Cushite replied, “May the enemies of my lord the king and all who rise up to harm you be like that young man.” (2 Samuel 18:31-32 NIV84)

He uses the covenant name of the God of Israel, so maybe he too was a believer.

Honourable mentions

The Kerethites and Pelethites: They were soldiers in David’s army (2 Samuel 8:18, 15:18, 20:7; 1 Kings 1:44), probably from Crete and Philistia respectively. We never hear of them after the reign of David.
Obil the Ishmaelite: He was in charge of the royal camels (1 Chronicles 27:30). He may have been among the officials who gave to the building of the temple (1 Chronicles 29:6).

So what?

As Christopher Wright says, Old Testament Israel didn’t have a centrifugal missionary force. What they had was an attractional force, and when it worked well, it drew people from near and far and made them worshippers of the one true God.


What is Jesus doing right now?

Happy Ascension Day!

Ubisi Monastery. Ascension of Jesus detail

Ubisi Monastery. Ascension of Jesus detail (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Acts 1 tells us that for a period of about forty days after His resurrection Christ appeared to His disciples, teaching them and occasionally eating with them. On one such day, He led them out to the Mount of Olives and ascended into heaven as they gawked looked on.

So what is He doing as He sits at the Father’s right hand (Hebrews 10:12)?

  • Hebrews 1:3 – presiding over the universe
  • Colossians 1:18 – ruling over His church
  • Hebrews 4:15 – entering into our struggles and empathising with our weaknesses
  • Romans 8:34, Hebrews 9:24 – interceding for us

Excerpted from a sermon by Alistair Begg.


Jonathan: A son unlike his father (2 of 2)

In Part 1, I looked at Jonathan the warrior.

The next recorded episodes in Jonathan’s life revolve around his friendship with David. While Saul was baffled over the identity of this giant-slaying shepherd boy, Jonathan’s soul was immediately knit to David’s soul (1 Samuel 18:1). He made a covenant with David, giving the future king his royal robe, armour, sword, bow and belt (18:3-4). Jonathan is clearly the instigator of this covenant, with David playing a passive role (see also 1 Samuel 20:8).

David’s subsequent military successes aroused a murderous jealousy in Saul. Jonathan warns David to hide and reasons with his father to have David brought back (19:1-7). Jonathan points out to his father that it would be a sin to kill David without cause, no doubt drawing on the Mosaic law.

David and Jonathan by Gustave Doré

David and Jonathan by Gustave Doré

Saul later reneges on his oath not to kill David but doesn’t tell his son, who continues believing the best of him (20:1-3, 9). 1 Samuel 20:12-23 contains the longest speech attributed to Jonathan. He starts and ends it invoking the name of Yahweh, in addition to mentioning the divine name throughout. Jonathan’s use of Yahweh doesn’t appear contrived or phony like Saul’s sometimes does.

Later in the same chapter, Jonathan again defends David to Saul. This time it doesn’t go well, and the conversation ends when Saul hurls a spear at him. Jonathan gets up in fierce anger and was grieved at Saul’s shameful treatment of David. Jonathan wasn’t angry that his father had just tried to kill him (again); he was angry on David’s behalf. Now that’s noble!

Jonathan meets up with David to report his findings. Jonathan’s parting words are: “Go in peace, because we have sworn both of us in the name of the LORD, saying, ‘The LORD shall be between me and you, and between my offspring and your offspring, for ever.’” He trusted that Yahweh would watch over both of them and their descendants for all eternity.

Jonathan’s last meeting with David is recorded in 1 Samuel 23:16-18. Saul was hunting David down, yet Saul’s son knew exactly where to find David. Jonathan “strengthened [David's] hand in God” and made a  last covenant with him. His words on that occasion would prove to be partially true: David would indeed be king, but Jonathan wouldn’t be there to see it. While Saul was expending vast amounts of resources in seeking to eliminate David, Jonathan was willing to be David’s second-in-command.

In what seems like one of the greatest wastes of the Bible, Jonathan dies on Mount Gilboa, killed by the Philistines he’d been victorious over many times before. He was faithful where God had placed him—as a valiant prince to Israel, a loving son to Saul and a loyal friend to David— and yet he perished in the prime of his life. If that be God’s plan for my life, am I willing to embrace it?

I think of another “wasted life”, that of John the Baptist. He too died a pointless death before reaching a ripe old age. But consider what he did accomplish: he prepared the way for and pointed to the Son of David, the Lord’s anointed. Both he and Jonathan were perfectly content to decrease while the Lord’s anointed increased. By God’s grace we too can take such a view of things.


Jonathan: A son unlike his father (1 of 2)

When seeking a comparison for King Saul, the Bible reader most naturally lands on King David. Nothing wrong with that: it has impeccable scriptural backing. An overlooked contrast I’d like to consider is that between Saul and his firstborn son Jonathan.

Jonathan defying the outposts of the Philistines

Jonathan defying the outposts of the Philistines

We first meet Jonathan (whose name means ‘given by Yahweh’) in a military context. He attacks a Philistine outpost in Geba (1 Samuel 13:3) and is apparently successful for Saul and the rest of the Israelite army camp there a few verses later (13:16). The Philistines move to Micmash, and Jonathan and his armour-bearer secretly go to pick a fight with them (1 Samuel 13:23-14:14). The narrator  of 1 Samuel quotes Jonathan as saying, “Come, let’s go over to the outpost of those uncircumcised men. Perhaps the LORD will act in our behalf. Nothing can hinder the LORD from saving, whether by many or by few.” Together, they killed some twenty men in “half the area ploughed by a yoke of oxen in a day” (14:14).

What was King Saul, leader of Israel’s army, one of the two people in Israel with iron weapons (13:22) doing while his son was engaging with Israel’s enemies? Quite a bit, actually. He sent a message throughout Israel claiming credit for Jonathan’s first victory and summoned the fighting men to join him. He also actively disobeyed God, giving as one of his excuses the scattering soldiers. Jonathan, on the other hand, placed his confidence in God, not in the number of men. He understood that the outcome of a battle depended on God, and his faith moved him to action.

On seeing the fleeing Philistines, Saul and the rest of the army belatedly join Jonathan and his armour-bearer to pursue the enemy. Jonathan, unaware of a fast imposed on the army by his father, eats some honey. Later in the day, his father comes to find out and is ready to kill him. On his part, Jonathan is ready to die (1 Samuel 14:43). Recognising that Yahweh had worked through him that day, the men with Saul took an oath and redeemed Jonathan so that he did not die (14:45). That they were willing to stand up to the king over such a serious matter on Jonathan’s behalf must say something of the respect and love the people had for him.

In the next post: Jonathan as son and covenant friend.


Reading the Protoevangelium of James

The Protoevangelium of James  (or the Infancy Gospel of James) is one of the documents from early Christianity that didn’t make it into the New Testament. The author claims to be James the brother of Jesus and the gospel gives Mary’s back-story. As the document is dated to 140-170 A.D., it is unlikely that James penned it.

Before I get to my observations on the Protoevangelium, some wise words from an expert. Simon Gathercole gets paid to read old manuscripts (and to do other stuff, I’m sure). At a recent conference, he and a colleague gave a talk titled The Historical Trustworthiness of the Gospels in which he gave advice on bad and good arguments regarding the extra-canonical gospels.

Points to avoid:

  1. Don’t say that they’re all gnostic. Some are, some aren’t.
  2. Don’t dismiss them on the grounds that they’re weird. Matthew 27:52-53 is also weird
  3. Don’t exaggerate the date of the texts, saying that they’re later than they’re taken to be

Points to make:

  1. The text of these gospels is not secure. In most cases, we don’t have their original Greek wording.
  2. There is a generation gap between the four canonical gospels and the apocryphal gospels. By the time the latter get written there were no eyewitnesses, no contemporaries of Jesus
  3. The apocryphal gospels display a cultural distance from 1st-century Palestine. They don’t pass the tests of knowledge of geography, personal names, numismatics, etc
  4. They also show a theological distance from the Old Testament and 1st-century Judaism, drawing more often on Greek and Egyptian mythology

I had read the Protoevangelium before hearing this, and these were my take-aways:

  • While the author is familiar with Old Testament material (e.g. Numbers 5:11-31) and the birth narratives of Matthew and Luke, he or she could have done more research. Which areas of the temple were accessible to non-priests, let alone women? Who is the Zechariah Jesus refers to in Matthew 23:35? I’ll leave it to you to read the Protoevangelium and see for yourself how these questions are answered.
  • It is plainly clear why God chose Mary to bear Christ: she was the most pure of all the undefiled virgins in Israel at the time. The divine initiative isn’t based on grace.

And so, unexpectedly, reading this extra-canonical book left me with a greater appreciation for the canonical gospels. For in them we see God in the person of Jesus reaching out to miserable undeserving sinners—Zacchaeus, the thief on the cross, etc.—and freely giving them a place in His eternal kingdom. Sadly, I don’t get that from the Protoevangelium of James.


The beauty behind Leviticus’ clean and unclean

If I had to choose my favourite Bible books, Leviticus would probably be in the top 5 (and Job in the bottom five, not because of the theme of suffering but because of how long-winded and insensitive Job’s comforters are; but I digress) so it’s always exciting for me to learn new truths from the third book of Moses.

In a recent interview, Nancy Guthrie, who is writing a series of Bible studies on seeing Christ in the Old Testament talks of what she learned in Leviticus. Mrs. Guthrie has had two children born with severe genetic birth defects. Under the Old Testament law, they would not be allowed in the tabernacle/temple. Why would God make such a rule?

I’ve set up the video to start at the relevant point, and I’ve included an edited transcript below. You may also download the audio and/or video of the entire interview .

Nancy Guthrie: [In writing the books] I’m specifically looking for big picture that points us to Christ. And I determined that the big message of Leviticus is about holiness: “Be holy for I am holy”. And so as I studied Leviticus—my process is that I read and study, I read commentaries, of course, and other books… I listen to a lot of sermons, especially by people I know who have a sound redemptive-historical emphasis and have the ability to beautifully display the gospel in Old Testament passages. So I began to work on holiness, but of course you know what’s really hard is the whole clean and unclean thing, right? And, you know, honestly, I read a lot of things by very sound Reformed, redemptive-historical people, but that was still… Honestly, I finished my chapter and I was done with that… I had read some who talked about it being somewhat random, that God was just asking to us to trust His designation of what was clean and unclean.

And I’d finished my chapter and then I listened to a sermon by Paul Blackham, formerly at All Souls in the UK. He did a sermon on clean and unclean and light bulbs began to go off when he connected clean and unclean to before and after the curse. And that all of the things that were designated as ‘clean’ are the things the way things were before the curse. For example, animals that are vegetarians. And that all the things that were designated unclean reflected the effect of the fall, reflect death and the whole mould and mildew, deterioration. And even some of the sexual things, about sexual intercourse or a woman menstruating, those things reflect the effects of the fall. In fact as we look at them, you can trace many of them directly to Genesis 3 and what God says is going to be elements of the curse.

And that was a real light bulb for me and it especially helped me… You know, some people, when we read Leviticus, especially if like me you’ve had a child born with a severe birth defect… Because a surface reading of Leviticus, because people with defects were not allowed into God’s presence… I mean, that on the face of it, that’s just… that hurts. It hurts when you’ve had… “What are you saying, God? My child’s not good enough for you?” A surface reading says that.

But if we instead begin to see this, I think actually the message of Leviticus is the exact opposite. Because God is saying, “I am not going to put up with the effects of the curse in my world forever.” And when He doesn’t allow a person with defects, He is saying, “All the effects of the curse are an interloper in my perfect healed and whole world. And I am on a mission to put an end to the effects that the curse has on the creation and on people and on bodies and on the way we relate to each other.” And so actually I think Leviticus offers hope to the person who has a child born with a birth defect because it is God saying I’m going to put an end to this. And His way of showing clean, unclean and then made holy. Because it’s that progression: what is unclean can become clean and what is clean can be made holy.

Isn’t that our hope? That we who are unclean can be made clean in Christ? And yet even more than that, we can be made holy, not because of a sacrifice we’re going to offer on an altar but through the sacrifice of Christ and that God is in the process of accomplishing that. He is making what is unclean clean and ultimately He will make all that is clean, He will make us holy and perfect and beautiful in His sight. So that’s where we went with Leviticus.

Jared Oliphint: I was hoping you would touch on that because we had a chance to talk on that briefly. This is a nerdy way to put it, but isn’t that one case where Christology and eschatology just have to go hand-in-hand? Seeing that as a temporary thing that ultimately gets resolved in Christ and ultimately when Christ comes again for the second time, that has got to be part of how we read Leviticus and minister to people and apply that to their lives.

Nancy: And doesn’t that inform us about the parts of the Bible, I mean, you know, frankly, Leviticus for some people it bores them. [Laughter] For many people it offends them. It’s very bloody and it can seem irrelevant to me because I don’t have to offer animal sacrifices so I don’t need to know this, and I don’t have to follow those clean and unclean laws and so basically we relegate it to that category of “it’s not going to be on the test and so I don’t need to know it”. Right? [Laughter]

And yet, the whole Bible is so rich for us and I keep discovering over and over again, and I hope I never stop discovering this, that the parts of the Bible that on first blush seem irrelevant or boring—you know, when we get to a genealogy list and we go oh brother! But aren’t those some of the richest parts of the Bible when we understand why they’re there? And similarly, I think I just found Leviticus that way. You know, all of the detail about the different sacrifices, each one of them shows me a different aspect of the perfect once-for-all sacrifice that Christ offered in himself. And all of those clean and unclean laws, now I just look at them and instead of a bunch of random ridiculous laws, I see that God, from the very beginning, was trying to impress on us our sinfulness, His holiness and His intention to make us clean and holy before Him.

Jared: Yeah, it adds elevation to it. Instead of just a first flat reading you have the topography of what’s going on in there and you’re right. It does the same for me.

I don’t know if you had any follow-up Camden?

Camden Bucey: I agree 100% and I think it’s just a wonderful picture when we see what Christ has done for us, not only now is the one who was unclean, somebody born with a defect—not only are they as clean as the best Jew, but now they dwell in the Holy of Holies better than anyone has ever been able to do before because of the mediation of Jesus Christ. So we see again the blessing that Christ comes to provide is not just a restoration, but an even further, greater blessing than we had ever seen or imagined before.

Nancy: And we are made clean only because He was willing to become unclean. What could be more unclean than entering into the filth of this world and touching lepers? But then the ultimate uncleanness was to be crucified on a Roman cross, to become sin…

That’s also the beauty of what we discover in this whole business of clean and unclean in Leviticus. The amazing wonder that the Son of God, the way He makes us clean is that He becomes wholly unclean.


Thessalonians, you know

Paul the Apostle, Russian icon from first quar...

Paul the Apostle, Russian icon from first quarter of 18th cen. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Considering that (a) the apostle Paul was in Thessalonica for three Sabbath days (Acts 17:2), and (b) a good portion of the church was made up of former pagans (Acts 17:4, 1 Thessalonians 1:9), it is remarkable how much the apostle had to remind them of in his first letter (you can’t remind someone of something they don’t already know).

Click over to Y’Know, For the Thessalonians and read more about the “you know” refrain of 1 Thessalonians and its significance.


Those repetitious apostles

Peter, do you have a new word from God for us?

I shall not fail to remind you of things like this although you know them and are already established in the truth. I consider it my duty, as long as I live in the temporary dwelling of this body, to stimulate you by these reminders. I know that I shall have to leave this body at very short notice, as our Lord Jesus Christ made clear to me. Consequently I shall make the most of every opportunity, so that after I am gone you will remember these things.
–2 Peter 1:12-15, J. B. Phillips New Testament

Paul, what about you? Anything new?

To write the same things to you is no trouble to me and is safe for you.
–Philippians 3:1b, ESV

Ummm… John?

Dear friends, I am not writing you a new command but an old command that you have had from the beginning. The old command is the message you have heard.
–1 John 2:7, HCSB